TrackAD

Airworthiness directives › 2002-16-19

AD 2002-16-19 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Series Airplanes Modified in Accordance With Supplemental Type Certificate SA1767SO or SA1768SO

2002-09-19
2002-08-15
—
—
Airframe
—

Models named: 727 series. Read the applicability below — it usually turns on serial or part numbers too.

Applicability*9

Model 727 series airplanes that have been converted from a passenger-to a cargo-carrying (“freighter”) configuration in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA1767SO or SA1768SO; certificated in any category. Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance

Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent structural failure of the main deck cargo door hinge or failure of the cargo door system, which could result in the loss or opening of the cargo door while the airplane is in flight, and consequent rapid decompression of the airplane, including possible loss of flight control or severe structural damage; and to prevent failure of the main deck cargo barrier during an emergency landing, which could injure occupants; accomplish the following: Actions Addressing the Main Deck Cargo Door Hinge (a) Prior to the accumulation of 4,000 flight cycles since accomplishment of the installation of the main deck cargo door, or within 250 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform a detailed inspection of the external surface of the main deck cargo door hinge (both fuselage and door side hinge elements) to detect cracks. Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is defined as: “An intensive visual examination of a specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be required.” (b) Within 36 months or 4,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, accomplish paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD. (1) Perform a detailed inspection of the mating surfaces of both the hinge and the door skin and external fuselage doubler underlying the hinge to detect cracks or other discrepancies (e.g., double or closely drilled holes, corrosion, chips, scratches, or gouges). The detailed inspection shall be accomplished in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. The requirements of this paragraph may be accomplished prior to or concurrently with the requirements of paragraph (b)(2) of this AD. (2) Install a main deck cargo door hinge that complies with the applicable requirements of Civil Air Regulations (CAR) part 4b, including fail-safe requirements, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. (c) If any crack or discrepancy is detected during the detailed inspection required by either paragraph (a) or (b)(1) of this AD, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Note 3: Accomplishment of the actions in accordance with Federal Express E.O. Revision Record 7-5230-7-5000, Revision B, release date December 18, 2001, constitutes compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this AD. Actions Addressing the Main Deck Cargo Door Systems (d) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the Limitations Section of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Supplement by inserting therein the procedures specified in paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this AD, and install any associated placards. The AFM revision procedures and installation of any associated placards shall be accomplished in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. (1) Procedures to ensure that all power is removed from the main deck cargo door prior to dispatch of the airplane. (2) Procedures to ensure that the main deck cargo door is closed, latched, and locked prior to dispatch of the airplane. Note 4: Accomplishment of the procedures for ensuring that the main deck cargo door is closed, latched, and locked prior to dispatch, in accordance with Federal Express Service Bulletin FX727-2001-5230-01, dated July 30, 2001, constitutes compliance with the requirements of paragraph (d) of this AD. (e) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, incorporate redesigned main deck cargo door systems ( e.g. , warning/monitoring, power control, view ports, and means to prevent pressurization to an unsafe level if the main deck cargo door is not closed, latched, and locked), including any associated procedures and placards, that comply with the applicable requirements of CAR part 4b and criteria specified in Appendix 1 of this AD; in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Note 5: The design data submitted for approval should include a Systems Safety Analysis and Instructions for Continued Airworthiness that are acceptable to the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Note 6: Installation of National Aircraft Service, Inc. (NASI), Vent Door System STC ST01438CH, is an acceptable means of compliance with the requirements of paragraph (e) of this AD. Actions Addressing the Main Deck Cargo Barrier (f) Within 36 months or 4,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, install a main deck cargo barrier that complies with the applicable requirements of CAR part 4b, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Note 7: The maximum main deck total payload that can be carried is limited to the lesser of the approved cargo barrier weight limit, weight permitted by the approved maximum zero fuel weight, weight permitted by the approved main deck position weights, weight permitted by the approved main deck running load or distributed load limitations, or approved cumulative zone or fuselage monocoque structural loading limitations (including lower hold cargo). Alternative Methods of Compliance (g) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO. Note 8: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Atlanta ACO. Special Flight Permits (h) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. Effective Date (i) This amendment becomes effective on September 19, 2002. Appendix 1  Excerpt from an FAA Memorandum to the Director-Airworthiness and Technical Standards of ATA, dated March 20, 1992 “(1) Indication System: (a) The indication system must monitor the closed, latched, and locked positions, directly. (b) The indicator should be amber unless it concerns an outward opening door whose opening during takeoff could present an immediate hazard to the airplane. In that case the indicator must be red and located in plain view in front of the pilots. An aural warning is also advisable. A display on the master caution/warning system is also acceptable as an indicator. For the purpose of complying with this paragraph, an immediate hazard is defined as significant reduction in controllability, structural damage, or impact with other structures, engines, or controls. (c) Loss of indication or a false indication of a closed, latched, and locked condition must be improbable. (d) A warning indication must be provided at the door operators station that monitors the door latched and locked conditions directly, unless the operator has a visual indication that the door is fully closed and locked. For example, a vent door that monitors the door locks and can be seen from the operators station would meet this requirement. (2) Means to Visually Inspect the Locking Mechanism: There must be a visual means of directly inspecting the locks. Where all locks are tied to a common lock shaft, a means of inspecting the locks at each end may be sufficient to meet this requirement provided no failure condition in the lock shaft would go undetected when viewing the end locks. Viewing latches may be used as an alternate to viewing locks on some installations where there are other compensating features. (3) Means to Prevent Pressurization: All doors must have provisions to prevent initiation of pressurization of the airplane to an unsafe level, if the door is not fully closed, latched and locked. (4) Lock Strength: Locks must be designed to withstand the maximum output power of the actuators and maximum expected manual operating forces treated as a limit load. Under these conditions, the door must remain closed, latched and locked. (5) Power Availability: All power to the door must be removed in flight and it must not be possible for the flight crew to restore power to the door while in flight. (6) Powered Lock Systems: For doors that have powered lock systems, it must be shown by safety analysis that inadvertent opening of the door after it is fully closed, latched and locked, is extremely improbable.” Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 6, 2002. Vi Lipski, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 02-20506 Filed 8-14-02; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Read the original on the Federal Register →

You just looked this one up by hand

TrackAD holds all 12,278 of them and matches them against the aircraft you actually look after — airframe, engine, propeller and appliances in one pass — then works out what falls due and when.

Look round a real shop first Start free

The demonstration shop is eleven real aircraft with a year of work behind them. No account needed.

The directive text above is reproduced from the Federal Register, a work of the United States government and in the public domain. The separation into applicability, compliance and required actions is TrackAD's.*1