TrackAD

Airworthiness directives › 99-15-05

AD 99-15-05 Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-10, -20, - 30, -40, and -50 Series Airplanes, and C-9 (Military) Airplanes

1999-08-18
1999-09-10
39-11224
97-NM-49-AD
Airframe
—

Models named: DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, -50 series. Read the applicability below — it usually turns on serial or part numbers too.

Applicability*9

Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series airplanes, and C-9 (military) airplanes, as listed in McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, dated November 4, 1996, or McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, Revision 01, dated April 29, 1999; certificated in any category. Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (f) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance

Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To detect and correct fatigue cracking in the fuselage skin or doubler at the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb, which could result in rapid decompression of the fuselage and consequent reduced structural integrity of the airplane, accomplish the following: Note 2: Where there are differences between the service bulletin and the AD, the AD prevails. (a) Prior to the accumulation of 48,000 total landings, or within 3,575 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform a one-time visual inspection to determine if the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been modified prior to the effective date of this AD. (b) If the visual inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD reveals that the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have not been modified: Prior to further flight, perform a low frequency eddy current (LFEC) or x-ray inspection to detect cracks of the fuselage skin and doubler at all corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, dated November 4, 1996, or Revision 01, dated April 29, 1999. (1) If no crack is detected during the LFEC or x-ray inspection required by this paragraph, accomplish the requirements of either paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii) of this AD. (i) Option 1. Repeat the inspections as follows until paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this AD is accomplished: (A) If the immediately preceding inspection was conducted using LFEC techniques, conduct the next inspection within 3,575 landings. (B) If the immediately preceding inspection was conducted using x-ray techniques, conduct the next inspection within 3,075 landings. (ii) Option 2. Prior to further flight, modify the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb, in accordance with either service bulletin. Prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings after accomplishment of that modification, perform a High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks on the skin adjacent to the modification, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, Revision 01, dated April 29, 1999. Repeat the HFEC inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings. (A) If no crack is detected on the skin adjacent to the modification during any HFEC or x-ray inspection required by paragraph (b) of this AD, repeat the HFEC inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings. (B) If any crack is detected on the skin adjacent to the modification during any HFEC or x-ray inspection required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. (2) If any crack is found during any LFEC or x-ray inspection required by paragraph (b) of this AD and the crack is 2 inches or less in length: Prior to further flight, modify it in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, Revision 01, dated April 29, 1999. Prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings after accomplishment of the modification, perform an HFEC inspection to detect cracks on the skin adjacent to the modification, in accordance with the service bulletin. (i) If no crack is detected during the HFEC inspection required by this paragraph, repeat the HFEC inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings. (ii) If any crack is detected during the HFEC inspection required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. (3) If any crack is found during any LFEC or x-ray inspection required by this paragraph and the crack is greater than 2 inches in length: Prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. (c) If the visual inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD reveals that the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been modified, but not in accordance with the DC-9 Structural Repair Manual (SRM) or Service Rework Drawing, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. (d) If the visual inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD reveals that the corners of the aft lower cargo doorjamb have been modified in accordance with DC-9 SRM or Service Rework Drawing, prior to the accumulation of 28,000 landings since accomplishment of that modification, or within 3,575 landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform a HFEC inspection to detect cracks on the skin adjacent to the modification, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, Revision 01, dated April 29, 1999. Repeat the HFEC inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings. (1) If no crack is detected during any HFEC inspection required by this paragraph, repeat the HFEC inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings. (2) If any crack is detected during any HFEC inspection required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. (e) Accomplishment of the actions required by this AD constitutes terminating action for inspections of Principal Structural Element (PSE) 53.09.035 (reference McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9 Supplemental Inspection Document, Report No. L26-008, Section 2 of Volume 1, Revision 5, dated July 1997, as required by AD 96-13-03, amendment 39-9671). Alternative Methods of Compliance (f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Los Angeles ACO. Special Flight Permits (g) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. Incorporation by Reference (h) Except as provided by paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B), (b)(2)(ii), (b)(3), (c), and (d)(2) of this AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service [[Page 49082]] Bulletin DC9-53-278, dated November 4, 1996, and McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-53-278, Revision 01, dated April 29, 1999. This incorporation by reference was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 as of August 18, 1999 (64 FR 37838, July 14, 1999). Copies may be obtained from The Boeing Company, Douglas Products Division, P.O. Box 1771, Long Beach, California 90846-1771, Attention: Business Unit Manager, Contract Data Management, C1-255 (35-22). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (i) The effective date of this amendment remains August 18, 1999. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 3, 1999. Dorenda D. Baker, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 99-23472 Filed 9-9-99; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Read the original on the Federal Register →

You just looked this one up by hand

TrackAD holds all 12,278 of them and matches them against the aircraft you actually look after — airframe, engine, propeller and appliances in one pass — then works out what falls due and when.

Look round a real shop first Start free

The demonstration shop is eleven real aircraft with a year of work behind them. No account needed.

The directive text above is reproduced from the Federal Register, a work of the United States government and in the public domain. The separation into applicability, compliance and required actions is TrackAD's.*1